hobika's blog

The Value of Presence ? That is the question.

hobika's picture

While visiting with several individuals a few weeks ago at the Ziff Davis Unified Communications Summit in Seattle, WA I noticed that some people hadn't yet realized the power of one aspect to the overall value of unified communications which relates to presence awareness. That is leveraging presence not just in instant messaging but in other communication vehicles can play an important role in transforming your business impact as an IT organization. As a result I thought I would dedicate this post to help create ideas around things that can be done to assist in helping IT in leading the way.

Here at Global Crossing in an attempt to leverage this core components of Unified Communications in an ongoing effort to incorporate the advantages of collaborative, converged services within our enterprise we've transformed internal applications from static non presence aware to anticipatory engaged communication tools that are supporting contextual collaboration with presence-awareness throughout the enterprise. In this instance presence-awareness (whether someone is available in simple terms and how to contact) is utilizing capabilities including chat, computer-based telephony, conferencing, IP video, and e-mail across tools that leveraged across the enterprise drive in principle more efficacy from consumption and corresponding execution. In fact it is my opinion that since presence has been embedded into our application infrastructure to enhance our collaborative capabilities it is natural to see transformational improvements occur around our "quality of experience" associated to the overall user experience. This is so because enabling enhanced customer experience truly enables the IT organization to drive one more component to our IT organizations transformational success in enabling the business to not only "react" but be proactive by achieving extensibility required within the distribution transparency model required for execution. Said another way the fact that presence awareness has been integrated into our application infrastructure means this action will further enhance our agility to enhance operational efficiency by allowing application "pivots" to be present thus accelerating communication by eliminating in some instances serial cognitive task execution.

As the industry landscape continues to evolve there are a few constants that will remain the same: (1) increasing business demands require more innovative, transformational capabilities between employees, partners and customers and (2) continually driving operational velocity reductions around the cost basis of delivering information technology services is imperative. It is commonly believed by many vendors such as Avaya, Cisco, Intel, Nortel and Siemens as well as software developers such as IBM and Microsoft that presence technology will continue to become an increasingly important tool at driving traditional costs out by attacking the serial nature of traditional work execution thus increasing operational efficiency.

So why is presence so important to Unified Communication services? Presence is important because it can become the intelligent communication application for converged IP communication services such as those demonstrated by our IT organization at Global Crossing. Determining where a user is and how best to reach them in our case by leveraging presence enabled applications that have been integrated into our infrastructure with the "glue" to increase the overall value of our converged IP services brought to the table and help realize substantial business transformation value.Said another way presence-aware applications offered on a converged IP communication service help evolve traditional serial actions of quickly determining and thus engaging with employees regardless of location, modality or scheduling which allows our globally dispersed users to communicate and collaborate in real time providing productivity in a truly global and mobile workforce environment. Combined converged IP communication services with presence technology provide for accelerated collaboration between our employees, partners and customers by knocking down the walls of traditional serial communications and by accelerating communication through anticipatory engagement.

Presence is the value.

hobika – Sat, 2008 – 03 – 01 09:34

Solving IT challenges doesn't have to be only focused on reducing costs but rather should focus towards innovation ....

hobika's picture

Time and time again I meet with technology leaders who ask a similar question - that is "How do we continue to cut costs while increasing productivity?" I know it sounds somewhat like an age old question that has been solved several times but I think its important to look deeper at the answers since they are as important as ever. Revisiting prior days as an IT leader whether at Global Crossing or my prior days at Kodak in their IT organization it can be stated that we were faced with many of the same challenges faced by most enterprise IT organizations leading to the above questions. That is "How can we continue to cut costs while increasing productivity....." or variants of that such as "driving operational efficiency while lowering the velocity of spend all the while increasing functionality by offering new and innovative services."

Such questions are based essentially on a few key areas:

1) Cost reduction - there is a need to continuously evaluate how services are delivered, while reducing costs without impacting performance, function and availability. Eliminate unnecessary costs ..... always!

2) Infrastructure Simplification  - always evaluate how IT operations are delivered to find faster and more effective delivery mechanisms, while reducing administration and, thus, overhead.

3) Increase productivity by leveraging investments in key areas such as convergence technology - converged communications over a secure, reliable network in order to meet the demands of the business needs can and will provide increased value while maintaining or reducing costs. The key here is to make strategic investments that further extend and continuously enable services at or reduced costs.

4) Continuous Innovation - Chose to focus on innovation in customer experience where improved application performance and real-time interactive applications to improve users quality of experience can be realized. That is - make investments that will pay back dividends by focusing on customers and overall care management.

With these similar challenges Global Crossing's IT organization needed to drive change by delivering on infrastructure services that were not only forward-looking, but also eased our business transformation in a way that helped us meet the demands of the business, as well as prepared us for what was coming next. Fast forward now a few years and when technology leaders ponder solutions to those questions I like to point them down the direction of solving the problems by embracing technology that will not only help them change their business delivery model but also keep them  aligned to some core tenants and objectives:

� Information technology and business leaders should align IT strategic plans with corporate and business vision/goals. Don't just have a plan, be sure to align with the corporations goals.
� Provide IT architecture foundations and fundamentals that will facilitate corporate transformation or be the catalyst for it. IT shouldn't be viewed as a cost center rather as something that can be transformational. That said its important that IT leaders lead and be able to see around corners to adapt and be ready for the business needs not just wait for the business to come to them.
� Maximize IT operational efficiencies by investing in key targeted technology areas enabling the future of services. You should be continually assessing whether or not technology investments (old or new) are adding value and returning on investments. If they are not then its time to pull the plug ... but be sure to only do so after you have secured support from business functional leaders otherwise your plan might not make it past the proposal.

In closing don't be afraid to answer the question on how to save money and still provide value. As noted above IT organizations should transform themselves so that they are truly leading not just following.

hobika – Sun, 2008 – 02 – 10 23:51

The cables are coming .....

hobika's picture

Today the web site The Inquirer published a story that an undersea cable with 1.28Tbps of capacity has just received approval connecting the US to China. As the story indicates this appears to be the first direct undersea fiber system to receive regulatory approval connecting both countries and although i wouldn't know whether or not thats true it does suggest the tremendous and unbelievable market opportunity within the telecommunications industry.

The most obvious and notable thing to take away from this story other than the system capability is the fact that the consortium that led the activity has not only won the approval but is likely paving the way for other carriers to do the same. This says something not only about the market and industry viability but also about under sea cable systems and the ability to connect different continents - those that have such systems are strategically positioned with respect to not just the market but also serving those customers who leverage those systems.

Although I am sure the regulatory hurdles were numerous the intrinsic value this type of development presents tremendous potential not just from the telecommunication market but also economic development on an aggregate basis across multiple service industries (cable system deployment companies, fiber manufacturers, hardware manufacturers, telecommunication providers, etc).

This is just the beginning my friends ....


Powered by ScribeFire.

hobika – Tue, 2008 – 01 – 15 19:54

Next Generation Technology - A History of the Future

hobika's picture
While I was pursuing my undergraduate degree in [w:computer science|computer science] I took a class that was called “The History of The future”. The professor who taught the class believed you can’t predict the future without looking at the past. I've always thought that was a pretty cool idea conceptually (and the class for that matter) and so it was that I incorporated that logic into setting about strategy and analysis work assignments. In laymen’s terms I often look back at what has been done, how well, how successfully while attempting to drive forward with new and innovative strategies that either were in support of a mission and vision or oft times defined them.


Fast forward from my college years and germane to the title of this post at hand – “[w:Next Generation Technology|Next Generation Technology] – A History Of The Future” is something I coined while between flights and reading the latest 2008 technology predictions from several analyst reports, published web articles around IT innovation as well as some daily [w:RSS|RSS] feeds I get to stay up on the market. Before I reveal what areas fall into the latest 2008 predictions lets evaluate the history for a moment to see how well that concept plays into tomorrow’s work.

Several years ago while I was working in a next generation technology development role supporting then an accomplished CIO as well as his lead and very capable strategist I was asked in late December 2005 to identify a set of next generation technologies that would be strategic enough to push them beyond the typical market offers and for which would be pushing the envelope of leading edge technology.  Although at the time I had a pretty good feel for the types of service characteristics that would define next generation services capabilities no one really knew then or now what the “killer applications” were going to be or actually are in today’s time and market so ultimately I was fishing – for lack of a better word – and casting a pretty large and wide net so that something would stick!


To support my research to identify some key and strategic next generation technology in 2005 I relied heavily on several research reports, R&D analysis as well as pined the honeycombs of vendors (software and hardware alike) looking to solidify what my research was showing. In the illustration below a number of capabilities that were either just being introduced (in development) or that did exist gave me good insight as to what and why could be incorporated into [w:Next Generation Services| Next Generation Services] to enable a wide array of potential services that were not only innovative but that were differentiable in the market place:

Next Generation Technology  
Of course the illustration from above is dated several years but the point is that it helped form the  basis for what I viewed in December 2005 as the “Next Generation Services” list that would at some point or another potentially saturate the innovation landscape. To that end, my perspective from 2005 on the top 20 or so Next Generation Services was composed of the following technology and service areas:


-Web Services

-Next Generation Unified Communications & Conferencing leveraging Presence Aware Communications

-Service Oriented Architectures

-Dynamic Meta Data Brokering

-Mobile E-bonding Services

-Device and Location Agnostic VoD Services / VoD

-Mobile SIP Communications

-Wireless MESH Networking

-Public WIFI Services

-Smart Multi Radio Internetworking

-Storage Services

-Mobile Applications

-Hosted Applications

-Fixed Mobile Convergence

-Virtualized data connectivity services

-Seamless Media Eco-Systems

As noted some industry analysts have recently released their views on the top next generation technology areas that will be most innovative in 2008. Those are as follows (in no particular order):


-Metadata services

-Virtualization

-Unified communications

-Automation

-Web based service platforms

-“Cloud” or “Fabric” computing (One could argue that fabric computing is the basis for cloud computing because architecturally the concepts are similar although physically they could be very different)

-Enhanced service management

-Dynamic content markup and creation services

-Social computing – I still don’t understand how some social web sites are valued where they are!

-Green IT – no not flex fuels, but cost savings …. Oddly this is one area that pundits are abound b/c conceptually it may be a great idea but in execution it takes energy and lots of it during transition to save energy.


I am the first to admit that I cast a wide net originally hoping and wondering if some of the technology innovations being discussed at the time would still be around today …. And I can honestly say that I am surprised as to how many actually appear to not only be on the new list from the industry analysts but that are actually somewhat pervasive in market adoption and consumption. If you review the original list from 2005 compared to the 2008 projections of next generation technology one begins to see that the history often times can predict the future! I am not convinced all will take and saturation/consumption models may not expand exponentially but its possible a few key one's will become mature enough to reach a tipping point in market adoption and thus truly become leading technologies for 2008. It should also be noted that when one analyzes the potential success of new market technology adoption its akin to a [w:poisson distribution|poisson distribution] where not all discrete events occur in time to ensure the probability of success. With that said there are clearly a few noted above that will become more pervasive as the year proceeds and will very likely mature successfuly.


In the end you can’t know for certain what innovative idea is going to strike it big … but what you can know for certain is that you may miss your opportunity to create a successful strategy and mission if you choose not to look back on history to see how the future might perform. That is why I always develop my strategy by looking at the history to define the future goals.

hobika – Tue, 2008 – 01 – 15 09:23

TelePresence – what’s all the fuss about?

hobika's picture

When I was asked a few months ago by a customer who was also a CIO what all the fuss about TelePresence was I thought long and hard about my response … not because I was concerned that a competitor was trying to sell into the customer an alternative solution but rather I was thinking differently as to what the potential customer was really asking – that is, what were the main issues or challenges in not only deploying a fully immersed panoramic video solution but also how he or she would eventually support it to their internal customers while achieving some cost velocity reductions along the way.

Before we go there a few interesting tidbits about the TelePresence space … according to a few research firms sales associated to TelePresence opportunities were expected to nearly triple in 2007 to $169 million from just $64 million in 2006 and these same research firms see sales of possibly $1 billion by 2011. Wow, that’s an impressive CAGR ! According to John Chambers, CEO of Cisco, he noted “TelePresence systems orders grew from the prior quarter by over 300%. In Q4 (ended July 28), the number of TelePresence systems grew by over 400% from Q3." That is pretty impressive if one thinks about what goes into a TelePresence offer from a service diameter perspective and in fact the actual revenue tied to the TelePresence service industry could be higher engineering, consulting, installation, etc  are factored in above and beyond equipment.

So what’s all the fuss about TelePresence? It’s like deploying any other real time sensitive application on the network isn’t it? In some ways yes and in some ways no …. First lets start with why its different … the amount of work that goes into the room engineering to ensure the immersive nature and performance associated to customer experience is at the highest quality is significant. Not only do normal electrical, network and physical build out aspects play a role but so to does acoustic balancing, lighting, video performance analysis and engineering needs to occur. Without a properly engineered room (or rooms depending upon how many systems you deploy) you may not achieve the level of visual and acoustic quality desired or intended driving higher consumption experience. More common to core telecommunication and equally important is the criticality that the underlying network achieve the best possible engineering principles in order to achieve optimal video and acoustic performance from a data delivery perspective. It goes without saying that the level of traffic engineering associated to QoS (classification, policing and shaping) and the corresponding core network behavioral network attributes and principles need to be defined such that the end users who are leveraging TelePresence capabilities see value and drive consumption while ultimately eliminating costs.

In the end TelePresence isn’t a “do it yourself” job for everyone but rather should be approached much in the same way you would approach packetizing your voice communications infrastructure – following well though out, well defined architectural and engineering principles in order to achieve success.  What goes into this well defined architectural and engineering design is choosing equipment suppliers and service providers who can live up to the demands of the underlying  service diameter needs. You do this and you are on your way to a quality, immersive video experience increasing employee productivity through engaged collaboration while reducing the overall cost velocity associated doing business across the globe.

hobika – Sun, 2008 – 01 – 06 12:22

UC going good to great

hobika's picture
At some point or another when the concept of unified communications comes up during customer interactions, dialogs with colleagues, strategy discussions - often times it moves to a discussion around features and RFCs and remains there. Having come from an IT organization for which I was immersed for several years in operations I have a different perspective when I think about unified communications. When I think about unified communications I don’t think just about SIP or SIMPLE or the ability to receive communications across multiple modalities rather I think about the constructs that make unified communications possible. Don’t get me wrong – the ability to communicate across multiple modalities simultaneously such as cell phone or a software based agent using a simultaneous ring or find me follow me feature is intriguing and to some extent are becoming increasingly more prevalent in a “techno gotta have evangelists” world such as my own but it’s not the only place where unified communications is making IT operations go from good to great!

What I see as taking unified from good to great and where truly exciting work is happening is where software and network architects alike focus not on the “features” alone (although continuous improvement is important) but rather on making unified communications seamlessly integrate into existing IT environments thus allowing IT organizations to drive further value from legacy / existing investments and hopefully simplifying their operations experiences. An example of how this might occur is in and around identity management and enhanced directory services where a users identity can be defined within a unified communications model that not only allows that identity to transcend one modality to another but also might be the same identity that is used for all application access requirements. This my friends is where some of the real magic and exciting stuff appears to be occurring and what is going to make unified communications go from good today to great tomorrow when mainstream adoption across IT organizations occur so long as business justifications and associated ROI necessary for the investments are realized.

That said many vendors today offer unified communications with heavy emphasis on SIP and SIMPLE for obvious reasons – to drive market penetration for current or future products as well as to protect the cannibalization of their installed base through next generation service expansion. What will be interesting to see unfold is not what service or features come next but how many of those vendors look to attack a core and longstanding issue of IT pain points – enabling unified communications while seamlessly integrating into existing back office infrastructures. The key to success in my opinion and those who are positioned for success will be how vendors use a single identity to authenticate and gain access to different modalities such as email, voicemail, enterprise instant messaging and collaboration software or web based tools thus allowing the ability to transcend multiple modalities seamlessly and transparently while affording productivity improvements that every CIO is asking and requiring. In my opinion unified communication can’t be yet another off the shelf solution that requires more work to integrate into an environment to become productive but rather it is about enhancing the bottom line – getting something more for very little and driving tremendous productivity gains. So to be effective and win market share such companies that offer unified communications must invest heavily on seamless integration to the back office and thus driving a core fundamental of productivity that unified communications anchor on.

So no new user names, no new user accounts, rather a single yet pervasive identity in order to make unified communications become great. You could say that the argument or requirement for a single identity isn’t new – rather its been around for a while. In fact there are companies that make identity management software and have been doing so for quite some time. What you can’t say or know and for which I am most excited about is watching how those companies map their current positions in delivering such capabilities into facilitating mainstream unified communications and its adoption further. Food for thought in case you’re not yet following me - watch what IBM and its Tivoli solution, Microsoft with its Active Directory as well as others do with their software around unified communications and how they enable further business communications. Heck, one never knows what Google might do to improve their recent moves into mobile wireless communications since they may see IBM and or Microsofts current positions in this space as a threat to their continued dominance around maintaining their velocity as a formidable competitor whose deep research capabilities rival all but IBM and Microsoft in an industry moving at light speed.

From this former IT guy some real exciting stuff around unified communications is happening … taking it from good to great. Watch how a single, enhanced identity will be mapped transparently to core IT infrastructure services and driving future unified communication services thus making it possible.

hobika – Thu, 2007 – 11 – 15 15:57
XML feed