Podcasts
Subscribe 
Industry Bloggers
Recent blog posts
- No major IPv6 content in the near future
- Convergence a Foundation to Unified Communications
- 6 years later...
- put your pencils down, the fed IPv6 mandate has elapsed
- Finally policy makers are focusing on rights of way
- VoIP Trends Report
- Glass Houses
- VoIP Considerations for IT Decision-makers
- VoIP and IP Telephony - The Benefits Revisited
- Harvard visit
User login
Navigation
Terms
Technorati







QoS on Office Communicator
As was stated, theoretically you could set the port ranges into the ACL and assign the TOS bit accordingly. Now we are talking about your RAS connection to Global Crossing's corporate network so even if you set the forward path and your service provider doesn't remark the packets, you will still have a forward/return path issue as the traffic is not traversing the service provider's network as priority. Also the return path isn't going to be marked as priority across GX's network (unless it is already tagged that way, I am not in GIS).
So yes, I agree, it is not looking good.