Podcasts
Subscribe 
Industry Bloggers
Om Malik
Rich Tehrani (TMCNET)
David Isenberg
Mark Evans
Alec Saunders
Martin Geddes
Andy Abramson
Andrew Schmitt
Richard Bennett
Ken Camp
Brough Turner
Dan York
Jules
Infinera blog
Steve's Tech Blog
David Beckemeyer
Garrett Smith
Michael J. Santarcangelo, II
Robert Powell
Dave Rustin
NSP Strategist
Ike Elliott
No Jitter
Kevin Werbach
Recent blog posts
- Something better than IPv6
- Virtualization – Part 3 - The Abstraction of Applications
- Gut check
- Top 10 in VoIP
- Surprise me! Is Innovation really just more for less?
- And now you see why broadband is not more ubiquitous…
- No major IPv6 content in the near future
- Convergence a Foundation to Unified Communications
- 6 years later...
- put your pencils down, the fed IPv6 mandate has elapsed
User login
Navigation
Terms
Technorati







Re: Ethernet vs. Token Ring
Welcome, Mark!
That was definitely another good battle, and maybe suffered the outcome it did because Token Ring was IBM vs. the rest of the world. In the end, I really believe that it was the practicality of the physical installation and troubleshooting the technology (10baseT..not thinnet or thicknet) that won over so many converts. Token ring eventually become a star topology as well, but by then 10baseT was entrenched and 100BaseT was on the way. There were still quite a few people using Token Ring-like tech like FDDI/CDDI, but FE still won.
I think that a lot of times it comes down to purely what people are comfortable with. As you say, engineers are humans, and humans have a tendenancy to come up with the data points that support the conclusion they want, while sometimes forgetting or discounting data points that fly in the face of it.
Caveat Emptor applies to the buyer of network services just like anything else. Ask a lot of questions, and get a second or third design opinion.