Podcasts
Subscribe 
Industry Bloggers
Om Malik
Rich Tehrani (TMCNET)
David Isenberg
Mark Evans
Alec Saunders
Martin Geddes
Andy Abramson
Andrew Schmitt
Richard Bennett
Ken Camp
Brough Turner
Dan York
Jules
Infinera blog
Steve's Tech Blog
David Beckemeyer
Garrett Smith
Michael J. Santarcangelo, II
Robert Powell
Dave Rustin
NSP Strategist
Ike Elliott
No Jitter
Kevin Werbach
Recent blog posts
- Public Service Announcement - Identity and Security – Pay attention folks!
- The phases of IPv4 exhaustion
- All I want for Christmas...
- Something better than IPv6
- Virtualization – Part 3 - The Abstraction of Applications
- Gut check
- Top 10 in VoIP
- Surprise me! Is Innovation really just more for less?
- And now you see why broadband is not more ubiquitous…
- No major IPv6 content in the near future
User login
Navigation
Terms
Technorati







Re: Ethernet "WAN"
I find it funny to see WAN and Ethernet in the same context considering that with multimode fiber 100Base-FX is 2km at full duplex. Even 1000Base-PX20 supports only in the vicinity of 20km-60km if you have the right lasers and fiber infrastructure. I'd call that a MAN. :)
I don't worry too much about 'broadcast' when everything is a switch these days. You need a whole lots of hosts in a single collision domain for it to start mattering. Tried to find a hub
recently? Darned near impossible unless you can pick up an old guy on ebay for $5. ;) Let's face it though, those no substitute for good architecture, no matter what technology you end up with on your WAN.
Ethernet is great for edge connects. Full duplex and switches are your friend