Add new comment

option 1 is easily corrupted, but probably not insurmountable

Option 1 would have a problem out of the box because occasionally stats data is corrupted or missing. A single corrupted sample can ruin a month's worth of reporting if it's averaged in. Missing data wouldn't bother a customer too much, but the provider would want to have established a method for billing if some data is gone. A single missed day could reduce revenues by 3% or so in the month (althought it's possible that any single missed day also reduces the true P95 billed rate). I thought about moving from peaks to averages when I was reporting aggregate network stats, but I felt it was easier to be able to throw out some samples. Any move to averages should include discards for "bad" or interpolation for "missing" samples.

Nels Thompson (not verified) – Thu, 2006 – 12 – 07 13:55

Reply

*
*


*

  • Easily link to terms in various wikis or other websites by typing [[prefix:term]]. Use the "|" character to create a "piped link," e.g., "[[w:public transport|public transportation]]" displays as "public transportation." For a full list of available prefixes and the websites to which they point, see interwiki.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <pre> <br> <p> <em> <img> <blockquote> <table> <tr> <td>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Verify comment authorship
Captcha Image: you will need to recognize the text in it.
*
Please type in the letters/numbers that are shown in the image above.