Podcasts
Subscribe 
Industry Bloggers
Om Malik
Rich Tehrani (TMCNET)
David Isenberg
Mark Evans
Alec Saunders
Martin Geddes
Andy Abramson
Andrew Schmitt
Richard Bennett
Ken Camp
Brough Turner
Dan York
Jules
Infinera blog
Steve's Tech Blog
David Beckemeyer
Garrett Smith
Michael J. Santarcangelo, II
Robert Powell
Dave Rustin
NSP Strategist
Ike Elliott
No Jitter
Kevin Werbach
Recent blog posts
- Public Service Announcement - Identity and Security – Pay attention folks!
- The phases of IPv4 exhaustion
- All I want for Christmas...
- Something better than IPv6
- Virtualization – Part 3 - The Abstraction of Applications
- Gut check
- Top 10 in VoIP
- Surprise me! Is Innovation really just more for less?
- And now you see why broadband is not more ubiquitous…
- No major IPv6 content in the near future
User login
Navigation
Terms
Technorati







blurry dots at 5:00 am
:-) I think I've been thinking about Net Neutrality too much, and carriers talking about "walled gardens". But with Option 2... You could "grade" the internet quality with QoS, and sell it appropriately, based on what the customer application was, or what their business model was. Sort of like "wholesale" internet service should bea little "less good" than enterprise/retail grade internet. Or the customer could choose their "grade" themselves, via an XML portal, and be billed appropriately! Arggh. The more I read this, the insaner it sounds. I'm trying to believe that a walled garden is a good idea, and that net neutrality threatens the future of the planet, but golly. It would just be easier to charge the appropriate amount of money for quality access. At BOTH ends, content and consumer. I need a nap now.